From the standpoint of federal law, however, the manufacture, distribution, and possession of cannabis remains a federal crime cannabis accounting under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Under federal law, cannabis is a Schedule 1 controlled substance, and anyone involved in its distribution is, all else equal, a drug dealer subject to severe criminal penalties. Curiously, federal law also requires these cannabis businesses to pay federal taxes on their income even though that income is illicit money as far as federal law is concerned. At the state level, assuming no black market, state taxes on marijuana similar to Washington and Colorado could increase state’s tax revenues by $13 billion nationally, with an additional $5 billion from normal sales taxes. If high tax rates or other factors perpetuate the black market, tax collections would be less.
Sponsored Content
- It also explains that marijuana companies are eligible for payment plans if they are unable to pay their taxes in full.
- In the United States, cannabis legalization at the state level has vastly increased over the last 10 years.
- Advocacy groups play a crucial role in pushing for legislative change regarding cannabis banking protections.
- The following sections walk through the key discoveries from states with operational markets.
- While Illinois’ system does reflect the relative difference in harm as it relates to THC content, it remains exposed to the shortfalls of an ad valorem tax.
A measure of prices paid for goods and services excluding food and energy; the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation. Measures the change in prices of all goods and services purchased for consumption by urban households. $0.0275 per milligram of THC in edibles $0.009 per milligram of THC in other cannabis products. For more information, see the full text of Measure 65, the state’s medical marijuana legislation. Additionally, dispensaries pay a 4% privilege tax when they purchase products from cultivators.
State and Local Taxes: A Closer Look
The weight-based approach would capture harm derived from the use of smokable products. Eventually, when product testing for THC content in plant materials becomes less costly, products taxed by weight can transition into being taxed by potency. In the short term, a weight-based approach captures externalities better than an ad valorem system and is simple enough to allow new products to enter the market without prohibitively high Law Firm Accounts Receivable Management barriers to product testing simply for tax purposes. The design of an excise taxAn excise tax is a tax imposed on a specific good or activity.
The Grinch Stole SAFE Banking from the Cannabis Industry This Christmas, Yet Again!
While weight-based taxes could be more equitable than ad valorem, they would likely favor high-potency products. Further, the system does not consider the ability to extract THC from the flower and create highly potent concentrates from a small amount of plant material. With alcohol taxes this issue is solved by taxing products based on both volume and potency (defined by alcohol content). States taxing Online Accounting different parts of the marijuana plant at different rates offsets some of this issue but does not manage to capture the externality down the value chain. As opposed to weight-based taxes on alcohol and tobacco which are levied on the final product rather than on the ingredient, existing weight-based taxes on marijuana are levied on the plant material, which may or may not be the final product.
- The tax should be levied early in the value chain similar to alcohol, gas, and tobacco taxes to limit the number of taxpayers.105 Limiting the number of taxpayers is important because fewer taxpayers make less work for both government and industry.
- This can severely strain their cash flow and hamper their ability to invest in business growth and expansion.
- Any federal taxes would pyramid on top of state taxes, compounding the effects of taxation.
- Some states are already considering changes to their tax structures, such as shifting from price-based taxes to weight or potency-based taxes.
- Continued advocacy efforts can help ensure that banking reform remains a priority on Congress’s agenda.
- The IRS indicates on their new webpage that federal courts have consistently upheld the IRS’ determination that income derived from both state compliant, as well non-compliant, or illegal marijuana sales are subject to US federal income tax.
- (b) Vermont legislators passed legalization of recreational marijuana in January 2018.
- Several bills have been introduced in Congress that have aimed to amend or repeal 280E, including the Marijuana Revenue and Regulation Act and the Small Business Tax Equity Act.
- Changes are also likely at the state and local levels as governments refine their tax policies to support the cannabis industry better.
- This tax code was enacted in 1982 primarily to prevent drug traffickers from claiming tax deductions.
The number of hours of drug education and counseling and community service required or authorized by Proposition 64 varies based on the nature of the offense and whether it is a first offense or a subsequent offense. The Pennsylvania Department of Health will handle all licensing/permitting related to the production and/or sale of medical marijuana. If testing becomes more reliable, the recommended system may be adjusted to a linear taxation without the notches.
Some states, like Colorado, Illinois, and Nevada, use price-based and weight-based tax methods, while other states, like New York, use price-based and potency-based tax schemes. On top of that there’s a 6.25% statewide retail sales tax, and potentially other local municipal taxes (which may run up to 3%). State and local taxes also play a crucial role in regulating the cannabis industry. They help ensure that businesses operate legally and ethically, and they provide a mechanism for governments to monitor and control the industry. However, these taxes can also create additional regulatory burdens for businesses, such as keeping detailed records and complying with complex tax codes. This includes being aware of the types of taxes levied, the specific tax rates, the basis for these taxes (price, weight, or potency), and any changes or updates to these laws.
